Pediatric Reference Value Profiling of Essential Trace and Toxic Elements in Healthy Children and Adolescents Using High-Resolution and Triple Quadrupole Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractBackgroundAssessment of trace and toxic element status is important for the diagnosis and monitoring of several pediatric conditions. Elemental deficiency and toxicity have serious implications, particularly in pediatrics wherein risk is higher. Pediatric reference intervals (RIs) for trace elements and normal exposure limits for toxic elements are lacking on modern analytical systems. Herein, reference values were established for 13 plasma and 22 whole blood trace elements in the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) cohort of healthy children and adolescents.MethodsApproximately 320 healthy children and adolescents were recruited with informed consent. Trace elements were measured in whole blood and plasma samples using 2 technologies: (a) triple quadrupole inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS) (n = 172) and (b) high-resolution sector field ICPMS (HR-SF-ICPMS) (n =161). RIs and normal exposure limits were then established according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.ResultsOf all elements assessed, none required sex partitioning and 8 required age partitioning (e.g., copper, manganese, and cadmium). Reference value distributions determined via ICP-MS/MS and HR-SF-ICPMS demonstrated excellent concordance, with few exceptions (e.g., molybdenum, cobalt, and nickel).ConclusionsThese data represent the first study wherein pediatric RIs and normal exposure limits were derived simultaneously on 2 different clinically validated MS platforms which provide urgently needed data to inform clinical decision-making for trace elements in pediatrics. Study findings suggest some trace elements require age-specific consideration for appropriate interpretation. Highly concordant observations across the 2 analytical methods also demonstrate the comparability and reliability of results obtained on both platforms.
