Equity Issues Rarely Addressed in the Development of COVID-19 Formal Recommendations and Good Practice Statements
Journal Articles
Overview
Identity
View All
Overview
abstract
Objectives: To identify COVID-19 actionable statements (e.g., recommendations) focused on specific disadvantaged populations in the living map of COVID-19 recommendations (eCOVIDRecMap) and describe how health equity was assessed in the development of the formal recommendations.
Study design and methods: We employed the PROGRESS-Plus framework to identify statements focused on specific disadvantaged populations. We assessed health equity considerations in the Evidence to Decision frameworks (EtD) of formal recommendations for certainty of evidence and impact on health equity criteria according to the GRADE criteria.
Results: We identified 16% (124/758) formal recommendations and 24% (186/819) Good Practice Statements (GPS) that were focused on specific disadvantaged populations. Formal recommendations (40%, 50/124) and GPS (25%, 47/186) most frequently focused on children. Seventy-six percent (94/124) of the recommendations were accompanied with EtDs. Over half (55%, 52/94) of those considered Indirectness of the evidence for disadvantaged populations. Considerations in impact on health equity criterion most frequently involved implementation of the recommendation for disadvantaged populations (17%, 16/94).
Conclusions: Equity issues were rarely explicitly considered in the development COVID-19 formal recommendations focused on specific disadvantaged populations. Guidance is needed to support the consideration of health equity in guideline development during health emergencies.
