Business planning and venture level performance: challenging the
institution of planning
Scholarly Editions
Overview
Research
View All
Overview
abstract
In this study we longitudinally examine outcomes of
entrepreneurial business planning to access whether this is a fruitful
activity or not. We use both data replication and data extension to
examine previously published and controversial research. Our empirical
setting is a random sample of 623 nascent ventures that we follow over
a period of six years - from conception, through exploitation venture
level performance, as well as termination. We compare and contrast
previous findings based on this data by observing sub-sets for the
population regarding a number of dependent variables. Our findings
highlight the importance of data replication, data extension, and
sample selection bias. Thus, we add not only to the debate regarding
the merits or liabilities of planning, but we also contribute to
evaluating normative research and publication standards by re-examining
past research using more comprehensive data and an extended time frame.