Protocol for validation of the Global Scales for Early Development (GSED) for children under 3 years of age in seven countries Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • IntroductionChildren’s early development is affected by caregiving experiences, with lifelong health and well-being implications. Governments and civil societies need population-based measures to monitor children’s early development and ensure that children receive the care needed to thrive. To this end, the WHO developed the Global Scales for Early Development (GSED) to measure children’s early development up to 3 years of age. The GSED includes three measures for population and programmatic level measurement: (1) short form (SF) (caregiver report), (2) long form (LF) (direct administration) and (3) psychosocial form (PF) (caregiver report). The primary aim of this protocol is to validate the GSED SF and LF. Secondary aims are to create preliminary reference scores for the GSED SF and LF, validate an adaptive testing algorithm and assess the feasibility and preliminary validity of the GSED PF.Methods and analysisWe will conduct the validation in seven countries (Bangladesh, Brazil, Côte d’Ivoire, Pakistan, The Netherlands, People's Republic of China, United Republic of Tanzania), varying in geography, language, culture and income through a 1-year prospective design, combining cross-sectional and longitudinal methods with 1248 children per site, stratified by age and sex. The GSED generates an innovative common metric (Developmental Score: D-score) using the Rasch model and a Development for Age Z-score (DAZ). We will evaluate six psychometric properties of the GSED SF and LF: concurrent validity, predictive validity at 6 months, convergent and discriminant validity, and test–retest and inter-rater reliability. We will evaluate measurement invariance by comparing differential item functioning and differential test functioning across sites.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from the WHO (protocol GSED validation 004583 20.04.2020) and approval in each site. Study results will be disseminated through webinars and publications from WHO, international organisations, academic journals and conference proceedings.Registration detailsOpen Science Frameworkhttps://osf.io/on 19 November 2021 (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/KX5T7; identifier: osf-registrations-kx5t7-v1).

authors

  • Cavallera, Vanessa
  • Lancaster, Gillian
  • Gladstone, Melissa
  • Black, Maureen M
  • McCray, Gareth
  • Nizar, Ambreen
  • Ahmed, Salahuddin
  • Dutta, Arup
  • Anago, Romuald Kouadio E
  • Brentani, Alexandra
  • Jiang, Fan
  • Schönbeck, Yvonne
  • McCoy, Dana C
  • Kariger, Patricia
  • Weber, Ann M
  • Raikes, Abbie
  • Waldman, Marcus
  • van Buuren, Stef
  • Kaur, Raghbir
  • Pérez Maillard, Michelle
  • Nisar, Muhammad Imran
  • Khanam, Rasheda
  • Sazawal, Sunil
  • Zongo, Arsène
  • Pacifico Mercadante, Mariana
  • Zhang, Yunting
  • Roy, Arunangshu D
  • Hepworth, Katelyn
  • Fink, Günther
  • Rubio-Codina, Marta
  • Tofail, Fahmida
  • Eekhout, Iris
  • Seiden, Jonathan
  • Norton, Rebecca
  • Baqui, Abdullah H
  • Khalfan Ali, Jamila
  • Zhao, Jin
  • Holzinger, Andreas
  • Detmar, Symone
  • Kembou, Samuel Nzale
  • Begum, Farzana
  • Mohammed Ali, Said
  • Jehan, Fyezah
  • Dua, Tarun
  • Janus, Magdalena

publication date

  • January 2023