Development of children, adolescents, and young adults with cerebral palsy according to the ICF: A scoping review
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractAimTo identify and provide a descriptive overview of the development of children, adolescents, and young adults with cerebral palsy (CP) in longitudinal studies; and map areas of focus according to the components of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).MethodLongitudinal studies of the development of children, adolescents, and/or young adults with CP were included in this scoping review. A search for eligible studies was conducted in the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus, and was restricted to the years 2002 to 2022. All outcome measures of the studies were classified into ICF components.ResultsIn the 56 studies included, there were 19 438 participants, involving mainly children, followed by adolescents, and lastly young adults. All components of the ICF were investigated and many studies reported outcomes in more than one component. Activity was the most investigated (67.9%; n = 38 studies), followed by body functions and structures (42.9%; n = 24 studies). Participation (14.2%; n = 8 studies) and environmental factors (3.6%; n = 2 studies) were the least studied. None of the studies investigated personal factors as an outcome.InterpretationThis scoping review provides an overview of studies on the development of children, adolescents, and young adults with CP, using the ICF framework, identifying current areas of focus and gaps in the research. Future studies should target participation, contextual factors, and the transition into adulthood.What this paper addsThe International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health can be used to map a range of outcomes through developmental studies.The main outcomes investigated in children with cerebral palsy were activity, and body functions and structures.Little has been explored in participation and contextual factors outcomes over time.The main classification used to stratify the participants was the Gross Motor Function Classification System.
