A comparison of community response to aircraft noise at Toronto International and Oshawa Municipal airports

Debate continues over the validity of a single dose-response relationship to describe annoyance due to transportation noise. Doubts about the appropriateness of a single relationship have centred primarily on the issue of differential response to the same noise level for different sources (e.g., aircraft, road traffic and trains). However, recent work suggests that response may vary for different types of the same source, namely aircraft, dependent upon the character, and specifically the number, of operations. Recent data collected around Toronto International and Oshawa Municipal airports permit a test of differences in four aggregate response variables. For the same NEF level, the percent at all annoyed at the two airports is not statistically different. The percent highly annoyed and the percent reporting speech interference are both significantly greater at Toronto but the percent reporting sleep interruption is greater at Oshawa. These differences can be explained in terms of the operational characteristics of the two airports.