UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Update systematic review, network meta‐analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and evidence‐informed European recommendations on surgical management of GERD
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractBackgroundThere are several options for the surgical management of GERD in adults. Previous guidelines and systematic reviews have compared the effects of total fundoplication versus pooled effects of different techniques of partial fundoplication.ObjectiveTo develop evidence‐informed, trustworthy, pertinent recommendations on the use of total, posterior partial and anterior partial fundoplications for the management of GERD in adults.MethodsWe performed an update systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and evidence appraisal using the GRADE and the Confidence in Network Meta‐Analysis methodologies. An international, multidisciplinary panel of surgeons, gastroenterologists, and a patient representative reached unanimous consensus through an evidence‐to‐decision framework to select among multiple interventions, and a Delphi process to formulate the recommendation. The project was developed in an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), and was overseen by an external auditor.ResultsWe suggest posterior partial fundoplication over total posterior or anterior 90° fundoplication in adult patients with GERD. We suggest anterior >90° fundoplication as an alternative, although relevant comparative evidence is limited (weak recommendation). The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/j20X4n.ConclusionThis rapid guideline was developed in line with highest methodological standards and provides evidence‐informed recommendations on the surgical management of GERD. It provides user‐friendly decision aids to inform healthcare professionals' and patients' decision making.
