Home
Scholarly Works
Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Traditional...
Journal article

Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Traditional Simulation to Improve Resident Performance in Forceps Deliveries

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) in improving obstetrics and gynaecology residents' performance and skill retention in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Thirty-three residents were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional debriefing. Performance was evaluated using an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) tool. There were no significant differences in immediate performance scores between groups (P = 0.082). At 4-6 months, both groups demonstrated improved performance scores (traditional, P = 0.001; RCDP, P = 0.001). Seventy-six percent of residents in the RCDP group indicated "real-time" feedback was advantageous. Three residents suggested this method was less beneficial at a senior level.

Authors

Pascoal E; Mueller V; Morais M

Journal

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 934–937

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

August 1, 2022

DOI

10.1016/j.jogc.2022.04.011

ISSN

1701-2163

Contact the Experts team