Biomass‐gas‐and‐nuclear‐to‐liquids (<scp>BGNTL</scp>) polygeneration process part <scp>II</scp>: Techno‐economic analysis

AbstractIn this paper, new polygeneration processes co‐producing electricity, methanol, dimethyl ether (DME), and Fischer–Tropsch (FT) fuels from different feedstock ratios of biomass, natural gas, and nuclear hydrogen generated through a copper‐chlorine (CuCl) cycle are analyzed for operation in Canada to produce transportation fuels. This combination of carbonless heat and a ‘carbon neutral’ biomass feedstock would contribute to the net reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In Part I of this work, the model for this biomass‐gas‐and‐nuclear‐to‐liquids (BGNTL) process was developed. This work expands on it and evaluates the economic and environmental impacts this plant would have in both Ontario and Alberta based on their local costs and resource availability. The analysis demonstrates that an increase in the ratio of biomass to natural gas in feedstock reduces the emissions of the process but increases the cost of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) avoided. The results show that the BGNTL concept can be an economically attractive way of reducing net transportation sector GHG emissions in both Ontario and Alberta in meaningful quantities.

Biomass‐gas‐and‐nuclear‐to‐liquids (BGNTL) polygeneration process part II: Techno‐economic analysis Journal Articles