Home
Scholarly Works
The Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements-Reply
Journal article

The Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements-Reply

Abstract

In Reply. —We appreciate the interest generated by the article by Drs Gill and Feinstein and by our Commentary. In particular, we share the viewpoint expressed by Dr Hürny and colleagues and Drs Perneger and Hudelson that empirical tests of key measurement properties are required for confidence in health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) ratings.Apparently, Dr Madorsky feels that we should not describe an accident in which a previously healthy individual becomes paraplegic as a calamity or a tragedy, nor should we acknowledge that such an event entails suffering. To us, this seems denying the obvious and contradicts our experience with many individuals and families.Society continues to discriminate against disabled people. Lack of wheelchair access in many public and private institutions is the most obvious form of what is a tendency to ignore the needs of the disabled and to peripheralize and stigmatize them. We understand that Dr Madorsky believes she

Authors

Guyatt G; Cook D

Journal

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 273, No. 11, pp. 844–845

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Publication Date

March 15, 1995

DOI

10.1001/jama.1995.03520350025017

ISSN

0098-7484

Contact the Experts team