Home
Scholarly Works
Quo vadis taxonomies of consistent behavioural...
Journal article

Quo vadis taxonomies of consistent behavioural patterns: time to change horses?

Abstract

For over a century, factor analysis (and its variants) has been the dominant statistical methodology in differential psychology, in particular in the development of taxonomies of consistent behavioural patterns (CBP) whether normative or pathological. Factor analysis suffers from considerable methodological problems such as arbitrariness of factor number, rotation indeterminacy, factor indeterminacy, lack of model robustness, universality (non-specificity). Over the years considerable effort has been applied to ameliorate many of these problems. This review examines the most recent literature addressing these methodological issues. The use of factor analysis appears to still be guided more by tradition (“if I have only a hammer, then everything is a nail”), art, and heuristics than by rigor. New methods are suggested including time series, computational, constructivist and complex systems approaches.

Authors

Sulis W

Journal

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 44, ,

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

April 1, 2022

DOI

10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101103

ISSN

2352-1546

Contact the Experts team