Outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Insights from the LATAM CTO registry
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with and without prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.BackgroundData on the outcomes of CTO PCI in patients with versus without CABG remains limited and with scarce representation from developing regions like Latin America.MethodsWe evaluated patients undergoing CTO PCI in 42 centers participating in the LATAM CTO registry between 2008 and 2020. Statistical analyses were stratified according to CABG status. The outcomes of interest were technical and procedural success and in‐hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).ResultsA total of 1662 patients were included (n = 1411 [84.9%] no‐CABG and n = 251 [15.1%] prior‐CABG). Compared with no‐CABG, those with prior‐CABG were older (67 ± 11 vs. 64 ± 11 years; p < 0.001), had more comorbidities and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (52.8 ± 12.8% vs. 54.4 ± 11.7%; p = 0.042). Anatomic complexity was higher in the prior‐CABG group (J‐CTO score 2.46 ± 1.19 vs. 2.10 ± 1.22; p < 0.001; PROGRESS CTO score 1.28 ± 0.89 vs. 0.91 ± 0.85; p < 0.001). Absence of CABG was associated with lower risk of technical and procedural failure (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43–0.85 and OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40–0.83, respectively). No significant differences in the incidence of in‐hospital MACCE (3.8% no‐CABG vs. 4.4% prior‐CABG; p = 0.766) were observed between groups.ConclusionIn a contemporary multicenter CTO‐PCI registry from Latin America, prior‐CABG patients had more comorbidities, higher anatomical complexity, lower success, and similar in‐hospital adverse event rates compared with no‐CABG patients.
