Safe management of bodies of deceased persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: a rapid systematic review Academic Article uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • IntroductionProper strategies to minimise the risk of infection in individuals handling the bodies of deceased persons infected with 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) are urgently needed. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to scope and assess the effects of specific strategies for the management of the bodies.MethodsWe searched five general, three Chinese and four coronavirus disease (COVID-19)–specific electronic databases. We searched registries of clinical trials, websites of governmental and other relevant organisations, reference lists of the included papers and relevant systematic reviews, and Epistemonikos for relevant systematic reviews. We included guidance documents providing practical advice on the handling of bodies of deceased persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Then, we sought primary evidence of any study design reporting on the efficacy and safety of the identified strategies in coronaviruses. We included evidence relevant to contextual factors (ie, acceptability). A single reviewer extracted data using a pilot-tested form and graded the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. A second reviewer verified the data and assessments.ResultsWe identified one study proposing an uncommon strategy for autopsies for patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. The study provided very low-certainty evidence that it reduced the risk of transmission. We identified 23 guidance documents providing practical advice on the steps of handling the bodies: preparation, packing, and others and advice related to both the handling of the dead bodies and the use of personal protective equipment by individuals handling them. We did not identify COVID-19 evidence relevant to any of these steps.ConclusionWhile a substantive number of guidance documents propose specific strategies, we identified no study providing direct evidence for the effects of any of those strategies. While this review highlights major research gaps, it allows interested entities to build their own guidance.

authors

  • Yaacoub, Sally
  • Schunemann, Holger
  • Khabsa, Joanne
  • El-Harakeh, Amena
  • Khamis, Assem M
  • Chamseddine, Fatimah
  • El Khoury, Rayane
  • Saad, Zahra
  • Hneiny, Layal
  • Cuello Garcia, Carlos
  • Muti-Schünemann, Giovanna Elsa Ute
  • Bognanni, Antonio
  • Chen, Chen
  • Chen, Guang
  • Zhang, Yuan
  • Zhao, Hong
  • Abi Hanna, Pierre
  • Loeb, Mark
  • Piggott, Thomas
  • Reinap, Marge
  • Rizk, Nesrine
  • Stalteri, Rosa
  • Duda, Stephanie
  • Solo, Karla
  • Chu, Derek
  • Akl, Elie A

publication date

  • May 2020