Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Systematic reviews and original articles differ in...
Journal article

Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the ratings from physicians, and use by physicians, of high quality, clinically pertinent original articles and systematic reviews from over 110 clinical journals and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSRs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study. Data were collected via an online clinical rating system of relevance and newsworthiness for quality-filtered clinical articles and via an online …

Authors

McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB; Project FTMPLS

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 449–454

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

May 2008

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.016

ISSN

0895-4356