Journal article
When Reviews Attack: Ethics, Free Speech, and the Peer Review Process
Abstract
The peer review process, whether formally applied in publication and grant review, or informally, such as exchange of ideas in scientific and professional newsgroups, has sparked controversy. Writers in this area agree that scholarly reviews that are inappropriate in tone are not uncommon. Indeed, commentators have suggested rules and guidelines that can be used to improve the review process and to make reviewers more accountable. In this …
Authors
HADJISTAVROPOULOS T; BIELING PJ
Journal
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 152–159
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Publication Date
August 2000
DOI
10.1037/h0086865
ISSN
0708-5591