Home
Scholarly Works
The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy:...
Journal article

The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Over time, the incidence of nephrolithiasis has risen significantly, and patient populations have become increasingly complex. Our study aimed to determine the impact of changes in patient demographics on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was carried out from 1990-2015. Patient demographics, comorbidities, stone and procedure characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in operative duration, complications, stone-free rate, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 2486 patients with a mean age of 54±15 years, body mass index (BMI) of 31±8, and stone surface area of 895±602 mm2 were analyzed; 47% of patients had comorbidities, including hypertension (22%), diabetes mellitus (14%), and cardiac disease (13%). Complication rate was 19%, including a 2% rate of major complications (Clavien grade III-V). There was a statistically significant increase in patient age, BMI, and comorbidities over time, which was correlated with an increased complication rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.15; p=0.010). The overall transfusion rate was 1.0% and remained stable (p=0.131). With time, both OR duration (mean Δ 16 minutes; p<0.001) and hospital length of stay (mean Δ 2.4 days; p<0.001) decreased significantly. Stone-free rate of 1873 patients with available three-month followup was 87% and decreased significantly over time (OR 1.09; p<0.001), but was correlated with an increased use of computed tomography (CT) scans for followup imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increasingly complex patient population, PCNL remains a safe and effective procedure with a high stone-free rate and low risk of complications.

Authors

Bjazevic J; Nott L; Violette PD; Tailly T; Dion M; Denstedt JD; Razvi H

Journal

Canadian Urological Association Journal, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. e317–e324

Publisher

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

DOI

10.5489/cuaj.5725

ISSN

1911-6470
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team