Home
Scholarly Works
Oxytocin Pretreatment Decreases Oxytocin-induced...
Journal article

Oxytocin Pretreatment Decreases Oxytocin-induced Myometrial Contractions in Pregnant Rats in a Concentration-dependent But Not Time-dependent Manner

Abstract

Recent biomolecular studies have shown that continuous exposure of human myometrial cells to oxytocin results in a significant loss of responsiveness to subsequent oxytocin stimulation, perhaps because of desen-sitization of the oxytocin receptors. However, it is unclear whether this phenomenon results in a reduction of the contractile activity of the uterine muscle in humans or animals. The objective of our study was to investigate the in vitro response of the uterine muscle of pregnant rats to oxytocin, following preexposure to varying concentrations of oxytocin, for varying durations. Longitudinal myometrial strips were isolated from 16 pregnant Wistar rats at 19 to 21 days of gestation and preexposed to oxytocin 10 or 10–8 mol/L (experimental groups) or physiological salt solution (control groups) for 1- or 4-hour period. All muscle strips were then subjected to a dose-response study with oxytocin 10 to 10 mol/L. The area under the curve, frequency, and amplitude of contractions were recorded and compared between the groups. The area under the curve, frequency, and amplitude of the oxytocin-induced contractions were all significantly suppressed in the groups preexposed to oxytocin 10 mol/L compared to either the control groups (P < .0001) or the groups preexposed to oxytocin 10 mol/L (P < .0001). There was no difference in the oxytocin-induced myometrial contractions between the groups preexposed to oxytocin for either the 1- or 4-hour periods. The inhibition of the oxytocin-induced contractile response of pregnant rat myometrium is observed as early as 1 hour of preexposure to oxytocin and is dependent on the preexposed oxytocin concentration and not on the duration of its exposure.

Authors

Magalhaes JKRS; Carvalho JCA; Parkes RK; Kingdom J; Li Y; Balki M

Journal

Reproductive Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 501–508

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

May 1, 2009

DOI

10.1177/1933719108329954

ISSN

1933-7191

Contact the Experts team