Home
Scholarly Works
Pro/con clinical debate: It is acceptable to stop...
Journal article

Pro/con clinical debate: It is acceptable to stop large multicentre randomized controlled trials at interim analysis for futility

Abstract

A few recent, large, well-publicized trials in critical care medicine have been stopped for futility. In the critical care setting, stopping for futility means that independent review committees have elected to stop the trial early – based on predetermined rules – since the likelihood of finding a treatment effect is low. For bedside clinicians the idea of futility in a clinical trial can be confusing. In the present article, two experts in the conduct of clinical trials debate the role of futility-stopping rules.

Authors

Schoenfeld DA; Meade MO

Journal

Critical Care, Vol. 9, No. 1,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

February 1, 2005

DOI

10.1186/cc3013

ISSN

1364-8535

Contact the Experts team