Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A systematic review of comparisons between...
Journal article

A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research

Abstract

BackgroundProspective study protocols and registrations can play a significant role in reducing incomplete or selective reporting of primary biomedical research, because they are pre-specified blueprints which are available for the evaluation of, and comparison with, full reports. However, inconsistencies between protocols or registrations and full reports have been frequently documented. In this systematic review, which forms part of our …

Authors

Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N

Journal

BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 1,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

12 2018

DOI

10.1186/s12874-017-0465-7

ISSN

1471-2288