Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts...
Journal article

A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence shows that research abstracts are commonly inconsistent with their corresponding full reports, and may mislead readers. In this scoping review, which is part of our series on the state of reporting of primary biomedical research, we summarized the evidence from systematic reviews and surveys, to investigate the current state of inconsistent abstract reporting, and to evaluate factors associated with improved reporting by …

Authors

Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N

Journal

BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 1,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

12 2017

DOI

10.1186/s12874-017-0459-5

ISSN

1471-2288