Home
Scholarly Works
Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals
Journal article

Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals

Abstract

In contrast with some recent theories of infinitesimals as non-Archimedean entities, Leibniz’s mature interpretation was fully in accord with the Archimedean Axiom: infinitesimals are fictions, whose treatment as entities incomparably smaller than finite quantities is justifiable wholly in terms of variable finite quantities that can be taken as small as desired, i.e. syncategorematically. In this paper I explain this syncategorematic interpretation, and how Leibniz used it to justify the calculus. I then compare it with the approach of Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis, as propounded by John Bell. I find some salient differences, especially with regard to higher-order infinitesimals. I illustrate these differences by a consideration of how each approach might be applied to propositions of Newton’s Principia concerning the derivation of force laws for bodies orbiting in a circle and an ellipse. “If the Leibnizian calculus needs a rehabilitation because of too severe treatment by historians in the past half century, as Robinson suggests (1966, 250), I feel that the legitimate grounds for such a rehabilitation are to be found in the Leibnizian theory itself.”—(Bos 1974–1975, 82–83).

Authors

Arthur RTW

Journal

Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 553–593

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

DOI

10.1007/s00407-013-0119-z

ISSN

0003-9519

Contact the Experts team