Assessing nephrology competence in general paediatrics—A survey of general paediatricians, paediatric nephrologists, residents, and program directors
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to identify nephrology topics of lowest perceived competency and importance for general paediatricians.MethodsSurveys were distributed to general paediatricians, paediatric residents, paediatric residency program directors, and paediatric nephrologists. Perceived importance and competence were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.ResultsMean perceived competency from general paediatricians across all nephrology domains was 3.0, 95%CI (2.9 to 3.1) and mean importance was 3.2, 95%CI (3.1 to 3.3). Domains scoring below the means for competence and importance, respectively were kidney stones (2.5, 95%CI [2.2 to 2.7]) and 2.6, 95%CI [2.3 to 2.8]), acute kidney injury (2.5, 95%CI [2.2 to 2.8] and 2.4, 95%CI [2.1 to 2.8]), chronic kidney disease (1.9, 95%CI [1.7 to 2.2] and 2.1, 95%CI [1.8 to 2.4]), tubular disorders (1.8, 95%CI [1.6 to 2.0] and 2.0, 95%CI [1.8 to 2.3]), and kidney transplant (1.6, 95%CI [1.4 to 1.8] and 1.7, 95%CI [1.4 to 1.9]). Residents, program directors, and paediatric nephrologists agreed that stones, chronic kidney disease, tubular disorders, and transplant were of lower importance. However, acute kidney injury was the domain with the largest discrepancy in perceived importance between residents (4.4, 95%CI [4.2 to 4.6]), nephrologists (4.2, 95%CI [3.8 to 4.6]), and program directors (4.2, 95%CI [3.7 to 4.7]) compared to general paediatricians ([2.4, 95%CI [2.1 to 2.8]; P<0.05).ConclusionPaediatricians did not believe acute kidney injury was important to their practice, despite expert opinion and evidence of long-term consequences. Educational interventions must address deficits in crucial domains of renal health in paediatrics.
